Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: At the end of the day it was politicking! The top 10 had nothing to do with how gracefully they answered the questions. I personally believe because it was televised, MSC (not judges) didn't allow certain talents to advance to top 10 because they could of NEVER justify last night out come. It's very sad that young ladies are told that the best would advance but in actuality their only there as a larger scheme to advance secret hidden agendas. This was not the judges decisions I'm more certain now than ever. How people rest at night I am uncertain! Author: No name [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: Sunday, June 30, 08:34:10am [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: It is very sad! With talent being 50% of the score all the prelim winners, including EG made it, except Mikeya Murphy who was consistent all week. I can't imagine how she and her family is feeling this morning after believing in the MSC for so long. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sunday, June 30, 08:46:55am

[> [> Subject: Correction: all the prelim winners made it to top 10 except Mikeya. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sunday, June 30, 08:50:18am

[> [> [> Subject: Love Mykeya but I did not like when she plugged her album during OSQ. That may have turned them off too. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sunday, June 30, 01:15:07pm

[> [> [> [> Subject: Then you don't recall the question. You stated in your interview you wanted to be a singer/song writer, what would your next song be? First, she stated she's already an artist, and second she has already released an album, If this is your reasoning to disqualify or to find fault when all the girls was putting in some type of plug...is sad! Bottom line there's NO excuse why she did not make top 10! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sunday, June 30, 02:05:31pm

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: The excuse is that she’s not professional and her interview probably showed this Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 07:26:57pm

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: The excuse is that she’s not professional and her interview probably showed this - Excuse or reason. While she isn't a pageant patty, she is far from unprofessional! I heard she does VERY well in interviews, so either this is a lie or she was low balled. Very clear MSCO is just not straight with the girls, and EVERY girl will NOT get a fair chance. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Saturday, July 20, 04:14:38pm

[> [> Subject: Maybe she’s feeling like she should’ve done better on that other 50% of that score other than talent. She only one talent in one group, there could’ve been 20 other girls from the other two groups with talent scores higher than her. Clearly math is hard for you Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 08:55:47pm

[> [> [> Subject: And clearly math is hard for you, if prelim is 50% + finals is 30% = Morgan Nichols Miss South Carolina. No, what's going on many believed over the years that the pageants was rigged but there's never been a more obvious proof of it than what happened Saturday. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 01:57:28pm

[> [> [> [> Subject: You can’t even make complete and rational sentences for anyone to understand what you are actually saying. Let me clear this up for you. Mikeya could win a talent prelim in her group and still be below 20 other girls including Morgan for her talent score!! How do you like them apples? Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 08:00:46pm

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: SEEMLY, everyone thinks it's about Mikeya Murphy. Let's just use your case scenario, that would mean EVERY TALENTED GIRL would had to score low in all other areas as you stated to justify the winner's scoring talenthe. BUT WAIT! Possibly their other scores were low balied to justify the winner's scores. If so, you just may have helped answer everyone's questions. THANK YOU! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wednesday, July 03, 10:07:43am

[> [> Subject: Maybe if she had come up with an original talent instead of copying Chari from GA she might have had a higher score. But once it’s been seen, it’s been seen. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 08:01:46pm

[> [> [> Subject: And wasn’t there a year she won a talent prelim and didn’t make top 15? Clearly it’s HER INTERVIEW and clearly her mom and supporters need to learn that and get over it Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 08:02:46pm

[> [> [> [> Subject: Very sad that it's comes to this! The bottom line, the end doesn't justify the means and some queens, LED'S, SC fans are very confused and wanting some answers. Try getting off and hiding on this board making comments about people because they don't agree with you! Check out Twitter, Instagram and Facebook comments about the pageant. So to single out an innocent young woman, who up to this point other young women looked up to, and as far as I can see did not say anything derogatory about the winner is being bashed on this board. Because some think people should always move on and allow disingenuous people do what they want without any repercussions. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wednesday, July 03, 10:34:53am

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: And wasn’t there a year she won a talent prelim and didn’t make top 15? Clearly it’s HER INTERVIEW and clearly her mom and supporters need to learn that and get over it-Did she not make Top10 two years in a row. NO CANDIDATES advances to Top 10 with a WEAK GHETTO interview! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wednesday, July 03, 10:45:03am

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: And wasn’t there a year she won a talent prelim and didn’t make top 15? Clearly it’s HER INTERVIEW and clearly her mom and supporters need to learn that and get over it Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 16, 09:46:07pm Clearly talent was NOT 50% and clearly the scoring was manipulated.

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Clearly talent was NOT 50% and clearly the scoring was manipulated. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wednesday, July 17, 09:25:38am >Clearly talent was NOT 50% and clearly the scoring was >manipulated.

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Clearly talent was NOT 50% and clearly the scoring was manipulated. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, August 08, 09:56:37am >>Clearly talent was NOT 50% and clearly the scoring was >>manipulated.

[> Subject: This makes sense. I believe a few girls were left out of top 15 and out of top ten last year who had superb talents worthy of winning miss America. So this actually makes sense with last year and this. Although it wasn’t such a shocker when Davia won. She may not have been the strongest in many’s opinions but she wasn’t the weakest and she grew a lot. Some things though you just can’t fix you got to clean the slate and start from scratch. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sunday, June 30, 11:04:16am

[> [> Subject: Re: This makes sense. I believe a few girls were left out of top 15 and out of top ten last year who had superb talents worthy of winning miss America. So this actually makes sense with last year and this. Although it wasn’t such a shocker when Davia won. She may not have been the strongest in many’s opinions but she wasn’t the weakest and she grew a lot. Some things though you just can’t fix you got to clean the slate and start from scratch.-I agree with this poster as well. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sunday, June 30, 11:21:16am

[> Subject: At the end of the day, the best person won! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 05:18:33pm

[> [> Subject: that is subjective. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 06:10:01pm

[> [> [> Subject: At the end of the day she was given a crown that wasn't based on the MAO system but on was based on MSCO system. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 06:44:09pm

[> Subject: If I was y’all I’d be very embarrassed of how I’m acting because you look like a bunch of butt hurt mamas who are mad their daughter didn’t win. Newsflash: your daughter didn’t do well enough to be top 15/top 10/top 5. Why? She probably had a bad interview. Is it the end of the world? No. Don’t like it? Don’t participate. Either way, find some hobbies or find Jesus because y’all need something. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 07:33:37pm

[> [> Subject: True. We know exactly who is posting these things because they post the same thing on their Facebook, so they need to stop being cowardous and just sign their name. Either way, had their daughter won, people would be saying it was rigged too because they sure didn't deserve to win Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 07:36:54pm

[> [> [> Subject: Nope....not even close....guess again. Some of us are just tired of rewarding mediocrity. Why is it wrong to be good in ALL phases? Those girls are out there. We just historically leave them clapping for a subpar winner and then tell them they are sour grapes if they dare to complain. SICK of the status quo. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 08:17:09pm

[> [> [> [> Subject: I didn’t see one girl out there that was great in all phases, and I can point out the error with each one of them if you want your daughter’s feelings hurt. There was no perfect person on that stage and overall lack in talent as compared to last year. Two nights of talent were bad, and one night only had like 2-3 decent people. Overall, your daughter wasn’t the best one, and just because she had a talent does not mean she was good in interview or onstage question. Maybe she isn’t as good as you think mom, get over it. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 08:24:14pm

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: If you think the only people who watch and care about this program are the mothers of contestants, then you are either stupid or delusional. It was televised on TV!! I truly hope more people than just the moms watch and care. Please see beyond the nose on your face. Please realize that drinking the Kool-Aid is hazardous to your health. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 08:42:41pm

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Trust me when I say the only people in this state who know or care about this pageant are the moms, families of the girls/people they tell about it, and LEDs. And trust me again when I say the general public does not know or care about the voy board and wouldn’t be writing on it. So yeah, we can make a general assumption on you being an uptight family member of one of the TWO girls who have mother’s acting out on Facebook or the one crazy former LED. Let’s be real, you aren’t hiding it well Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 08:54:10pm

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Bless your heart....you really are stupid and delusional. If I told you my name you wouldn’t even know me. After watching Saturday’s fiasco, I truly hope as you do that the only people who watched were contestants family members. Because if anyone else watched it, you would lose sponsorship right and left, and this poor new queen will never be asked to do any appearances. Again....bless your heart for your shortsighted, narrow-minded view. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 09:02:12pm

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: And yet oddly enough our sponsorships are going up every year and we are still doing better than the national pageant. And if you are so concerned with a pageant you have no involvement in then you really need a life or some hobbies. But go ahead and list your name then ;) Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 09:09:40pm >The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Trust me when I say the only people in this state who know or care about this pageant are the moms, families of the girls/people they tell about it, and LEDs. And trust me again when I say the general public does not know or care about the voy board and wouldn’t be writing on it. So yeah, we can make a general assumption on you being an uptight family member of one of the TWO girls who have mother’s acting out on Facebook or the one crazy former LED. Let’s be real, you aren’t hiding it well Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 09:02:57pm The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in interview and on stage question and she was way ahead of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: One thing remains true, anytime this organization wants to justify not advancing a candidate that's good in onstage performances, the interview card is pulled. "It must be the interview." to try and justify unfairness. Making girls super nervous about it as if they're not capable of answering basic questions for 10 minutes. Get real this the only phase of competition that you can't see but makes it appears that only a select few are intellectual and smart. So no matter how you spin this, you would hide on this board and tear down other girls as well, who are equally intellectual but their talent is better and STILL weighs more based on the MAO but evidently not MSCOO. SO SHAME ON YOU if your on the board/LED that recruit these girls every year to fill your slots or meet your quotas!! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 10:28:34pm >The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: I love how you act like it doesn’t matter when it’s the longest time they spend with the judges and the only time they truly spend with them. Would it make you feel better if you sat there and watched your daughter suck? Or everyone else did? You’re so full of it. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 10:56:18pm >>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: I love how you act like it doesn’t matter when it’s the longest time they spend with the judges and the only time they truly spend with them. Would it make you feel better if you sat there and watched your daughter suck? Or everyone else did? You’re so full of it.-You completely missed the point...oh but wait you can see things through a very tunnel vision. Now it ALL makes sense, some only get what they want to get. So I would not be trying to reason with foolery. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 12:16:22am >>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win >.

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: One thing remains true, anytime this organization wants to justify not advancing a candidate that's good in onstage performances, the interview card is pulled. "It must be the interview." to try and justify unfairness. Making girls super nervous about it as if they're not capable of answering basic questions for 10 minutes. Get real this the only phase of competition that you can't see but makes it appears that only a select few are intellectual and smart. So no matter how you spin this, you would hide on this board and tear down other girls as well, who are equally intellectual but their talent is better and STILL weighs more based on the MAO but evidently not MSCOO. SO SHAME ON YOU if your on the board/LED that recruit these girls every year to fill your slots or meet your quotas!! Author: Pageant winner was found in interview and they loved her after that . That’s why she won ! [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, July 04, 09:23:33pm >>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: One thing remains true, anytime this organization wants to justify not advancing a candidate that's good in onstage performances, the interview card is pulled. "It must be the interview." to try and justify unfairness. Making girls super nervous about it as if they're not capable of answering basic questions for 10 minutes. Get real this the only phase of competition that you can't see but makes it appears that only a select few are intellectual and smart. So no matter how you spin this, you would hide on this board and tear down other girls as well, who are equally intellectual but their talent is better and STILL weighs more based on the MAO but evidently not MSCOO. SO SHAME ON YOU if your on the board/LED that recruit these girls every year to fill your slots or meet your quotas!! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 16, 10:59:08pm First, we will never know her scores, or anybody else for that matter so to say she was way ahead of everyone else is simply not true and can't be proven. I saw at least 10 girls just as poised and well spoken on stage. Second, everyone knew during prelims personal interview was 25% & talent was 50%. We can say with confidence that she probably scored well in personal interview and we all know she should have scored one of the worst in talent. I would say bottom third easily. So how she even made top 10 is suspicious at best. Third, once they got her in top 5, it is ballot at that point and not the top overall score. So all they needed to do was figure out how to allocate and pad the scores to get her in top 15, then top 10, & finally in top 5. I ran a few scenarios with scores and none of them had her in top 10 unless you padded her talent scores and gave lower than usual marks to others. So I do not see how you can view this judging other than judges we given a directive by MSCO & they scored it that way. It seems very obvious. I just don't want to believe an organization can be this misleading and dishonest with the scoring. If this is how they want to run MSCO, then save everyone the trouble and money and simply have girls interview for the job. Treat it like a normal job interview or like an audition for a part in a play. Either way, it will still be more honest than what we saw in June.

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: AND YOUR NAME IS???? PLEASE TELL US. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 04:55:05pm

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: AND YOURS? TELL US PLEASE! You made mentioned to sitting in interviews and watching girls suck, NO what everyone witnessed is the winner's talent SUCKED and crown in competition were talent is the highest % factor. Someone should have advised her of another talent, therefore has open her up to this type of scrutiny. So the public isn't wrong for wanting answers, it's the ones who advised her. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wednesday, July 03, 09:55:22am

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: While there were NO perfect girl in every area but there was a MAO scoring system that ALL states should abide by, not the individual state criteria for who they deem best. Bottom the MAO guide lines was not followed. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 02:11:02pm >>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: While there were NO perfect girl in every area but there was a MAO scoring system that ALL states should abide by, not the individual state criteria for who they deem best. Bottom line the MAO guide lines was not followed. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 02:18:44pm >>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win >.

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Same person keeps posting on several messages. They don’t understand the past tense of “was” is “were”. Give it up. Decision has been made. Move on. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 03:15:52pm >>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win >.

[> Subject: The only one in Mikeya’s group who did better than her was Tori. Everyone else was top 15 or lower, which means she could’ve easily had the highest talent score in a low group with Tori being right behind her and Tori having a much better interview. Just because she won a talent prelim doesn’t mean her talent score was high compared to the other two groups or that she deserved to be in the top 10 Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 08:20:03pm >>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> Subject: Morgan Ellis, Yvannah Garcia, even the candidate with baton, and did better than Tori Sizemore. Tori barely made it through her performance as Morgan Nichols. How either was in Top 5 is beyond me. And people will continue to justify that other girls besides Mikeya, was either low balled or ROBBED! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, July 04, 11:49:14am >>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win >.

[> [> [> Subject: Morgan Ellis, Yvannah Garcia, even the candidate with baton, all did better than Tori Sizemore. Tori barely made it through her performance as Morgan Nichols. How either was in Top 5 is beyond me. And people will continue to ignore that other girls besides Mikeya, was either low balled or ROBBED! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, July 04, 02:54:50pm >>>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores >in >>>>interview and on stage question and she was way >ahead >>>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win >>.

[> [> [> [> Subject: Tori was actually not that bad. She isn’t a horrible singer and actually has some potential. Was it perfect? No. But it wasn’t bad. I just thought it was average. I do believe with the right kind of vocal coach she could even improve. Like I said it wasnt perfect but it also wasn’t horrible. There were a few other vocalist in MIss that were better some of which made top 15 some didn’t. But Tori was very good in all other phases so it all makes sense. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, July 04, 03:48:31pm >>>>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores >>in >>>>>interview and on stage question and she was way >>ahead >>>>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>>>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>>>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not >win >>>.

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: The response to the comment in regards to Tori, is that she was the next best talent in Mikeya's group and the examples provided shows that that was untrue. Now, did she do better than Nichols? Yes, but because Nichols was just that off key, she took the spotlight off of Tori. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, July 04, 05:07:14pm >>>>>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores >>>in >>>>>>interview and on stage question and she was way >>>ahead >>>>>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC >without >>>>>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker >for >>>>>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not >>win >>>>.

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Morgan Ellis, Yvannah Garcia, even the candidate with baton, all did better than Tori Sizemore. Tori barely made it through her performance as Morgan Nichols. How either was in Top 5 is beyond me. And people will continue to ignore that other girls besides Mikeya, was either low balled or ROBBED! Author: Tori and Morgan’s interview was higher and on stage question than the firs that’s didn’t make the cut . [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, July 04, 09:50:38pm >>>>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores >>in >>>>>interview and on stage question and she was way >>ahead >>>>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>>>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>>>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not >win >>>.

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: I would like to know how you would know that? Based upon their talent, they would of had to receive a perfect score from ALL judges in those two areas and every well rounded candidates that performed on stage, with a strong talent would of had to score very low in those two areas to justify what you're saying. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, July 04, 10:57:09pm >>>>>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores >>>in >>>>>>interview and on stage question and she was way >>>ahead >>>>>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC >without >>>>>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker >for >>>>>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not >>win >>>>.

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: I would like to know how you would know that? Based upon their talent, they would of had to receive a perfect score from ALL judges in those two areas and every well rounded candidates that performed on stage, with a strong talent would of had to score very low in those two areas to justify what you're saying. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, July 04, 11:03:08pm >>>>>>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high >scores >>>>in >>>>>>>interview and on stage question and she was way >>>>ahead >>>>>>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC >>without >>>>>>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker >>for >>>>>>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not >>>win >>>>>.

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: I would like to know how you would know that? Based upon their talent, they would of had to receive a perfect score from ALL judges in those two areas and every well rounded candidates that performed on stage, with a strong talent would of had to score very low in those two areas to justify what you're saying. Author: Just from hearing on stage question you can tell Tori and Morgan had a good interview [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Friday, July 05, 01:30:44am >>>>>>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high >scores >>>>in >>>>>>>interview and on stage question and she was way >>>>ahead >>>>>>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC >>without >>>>>>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker >>for >>>>>>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not >>>win >>>>>.

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Again, to justify that top 5 and the winner, you would have to say regardless to Tori and Morgan talent, and regarding to ALL the other talented educated candidates, who may have the same interview coaches, DID NOT do well in interview. And as some would have others to believe, Tori and Morgan was sent down from some type of interview gods and no one else stood a chance! Not likely and unbelievable. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Friday, July 05, 11:19:53am >>>>>>>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high >>scores >>>>>in >>>>>>>>interview and on stage question and she was way >>>>>ahead >>>>>>>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC >>>without >>>>>>>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker >>>for >>>>>>>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not >>>>win >>>>>>.

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Again, to justify that top 5 and the winner, you would have to say regardless to Tori and Morgan talent, and regarding to ALL the other talented educated candidates, who may have the same interview coaches, DID NOT do well in interview. And as some would have others to believe, Tori and Morgan was sent down from some type of interview gods and no one else stood a chance! Not likely and unbelievable. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Friday, July 05, 12:39:28pm >>>>>>>>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high >>>scores >>>>>>in >>>>>>>>>interview and on stage question and she was way >>>>>>ahead >>>>>>>>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC >>>>without >>>>>>>>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker >>>>for >>>>>>>>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did >not >>>>>win >>>>>>>.

[> Subject: And reading this thread is why Kim Aiken is the last Miss America SC will lahev in a long time. Good organization gome down the toilet. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wednesday, July 17, 09:37:02am All this trash talk is killing us.

[> [> Subject: Re: And reading this thread is why Kim Aiken is the last Miss America SC will have in a long time. Good organization gome down the toilet. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wednesday, July 17, 09:38:10am > >All this trash talk is killing us.

[> [> [> Subject: Re: All this trash talk is killing us.-Truth doesn't kill an organization, but lack of truth will!!! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wednesday, July 17, 09:54:18am >> >>All this trash talk is killing us.

[> [> [> [> Subject: Preaching to the choir sister woman. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wednesday, July 17, 12:31:10pm