Re: are you a moron? The PUBLISHED judging criteria says that Talent is 50%, not interview. And while I agree that she was the girl to beat, that opinion was formed before she opened her mouth to sing. When that happened, she legit fell out of the Top 10. Either stick to the judging criteria or change it. I'm not saying she didn't blow everyone else away in the other areas, especiRe- Exactly, so why would any respectable JUDGES, set Miss SC up to compete at MA knowingly that talent is 50%. I still believe scores was either manipulated by low balling certain girls in certain areas and over exaggerated others in the areas. Or NO girl stood a chance before the pageant began! These are the only answers to this pageant fiasco! -- SOUTH CAROLINA MAO - PLEASE NO BANNERS

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: are you a moron? The PUBLISHED judging criteria says that Talent is 50%, not interview. And while I agree that she was the girl to beat, that opinion was formed before she opened her mouth to sing. When that happened, she legit fell out of the Top 10. Either stick to the judging criteria or change it. I'm not saying she didn't blow everyone else away in the other areas, especiRe- Exactly, so why would any respectable JUDGES, set Miss SC up to compete at MA knowingly that talent is 50%. I still believe scores was either manipulated by low balling certain girls in certain areas and over exaggerated others in the areas. Or NO girl stood a chance before the pageant began! These are the only answers to this pageant fiasco!

Author:
No name
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: Saturday, July 20, 03:54:24pm
In reply to: 's message, "are you a moron? The PUBLISHED judging criteria says that Talent is 50%, not interview. And while I agree that she was the girl to beat, that opinion was formed before she opened her mouth to sing. When that happened, she legit fell out of the Top 10. Either stick to the judging criteria or change it. I'm not saying she didn't blow everyone else away in the other areas, especially CMN and ad sales, but that girl couldn't have been in even the top half of Talent." on Saturday, July 20, 12:08:07pm

>>>Not a perfect resonse at all. The pageant is won in
>>>interview, not talent.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]