Author:
No name
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 01:37:05pm
>>>>Morgan is very very MAO 2.0 - one of the big
>problems
>>>>up front is the way MAO markets the competition, and
>>>>the other is what people interpret from that. When
>>>>they say “talent is 50%” some people stop
>>>>listening and paying attention to what’s really
>>>>going on. I wish MAO would STOP with the
>percentages,
>>>>because if you watched Miss America in September, it
>>>>was obvious that talent was not a primary factor. It
>>>>can be used as a differentiator, but as we can see,
>>>>not always.
>>>>Some girls and their families have put THOUSANDs of
>>>>dollars into a talent, going as far as to get
>college
>>>>degrees in the field, only to be beaten by a girl
>>with
>>>>a last minute dredged up talent. They don’t get
>it
>>>>because that’s their perspective. They feel
>>cheated,
>>>>but that’s on them.
>>>>MAO 2.0 is about social change. Body positivity. The
>>>>underdog changing the world. The woman set out to
>>cure
>>>>cancer. The girl aspiring to be president. If you
>are
>>>>pretty, or blonde, or naturally thin, welcome to the
>>>>new handicap. You BETTER have a plan to save the
>>>>world, beat the odds, raise money for the children,
>>>>etc. or you.won’t.win. And Don’t think because
>>you
>>>>just showed up with a great talent, or natural hair,
>>>>or you’re winning the sympathy vote that THAT is
>>all
>>>>you need. You better be the “new” complete
>>>>package, it’s NOT a pageant anymore and you either
>>>>approach it traditionally and get frustrated, or get
>>a
>>>>new plan and become competitive.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
|