Subject: Re: Okay. |
Author: No name
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: Wednesday, July 24, 10:19:17am
In reply to:
's message, "Okay." on Tuesday, July 23, 07:35:28am
>>>>>>>Judges are charged to score as follows: 1,2,3
>>below
>>>>>>>average 4,5,6 average, above average 7,8,9,
>>>>>>>outstanding 10. Prelim scores precentages with
>>>>>highest
>>>>>>>and lowest dropped from a panel of 5 judges.
>>>>Example:
>>>>>>>girl with strong interview&OSI getting 2nd in EG
>>>and
>>>>>>>weak/averg talent--interview 25%
>>>10+10+10=30×2.0=60
>>>>>>>Talent 50% 5+5+5=15×5.0=75 OSI 15%
>>>>>>>10+10+10=30×1.5=45 EG 15% 10+10+9=29×1.5=43.5
>>>>total
>>>>>>>prelim points=223.5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Girl with average interview OSI & EG but strong
>>>>>>>talent/prelim winner---interview 6+6+6=18×2.0=36
>>>>>>>Talent 10+10+9=29×5.0=145 OSI 6+6+6=18×1.5=27
>EG
>>>>>>>6+6+6=18×1.5=27 total prelim points=235
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>This is only one of many possible scenarios. If
>>>girl
>>>>>1
>>>>>>>was scored below average (1,2,3) for her talent,
>>it
>>>>>>>would be extremely difficult for her to make the
>>>top
>>>>>>>15 out of 50+ contestants. Threes in talent drops
>>>>her
>>>>>>>score by 30 points bringing her below the 200
>>point
>>>>>>>mark (60+45+45+43.5=193.5)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please note once you make the top 15 these prelim
>>>>>>>numbers are deleted and a composite score from
>>each
>>>>>>>judge based on how that judge sees your overall
>>>>>prelim
>>>>>>>performance is given. The judge should stay
>>>>>consistent
>>>>>>>with their scoring and not elevate a contestant
>>>when
>>>>>>>assigning this score. Discussion is allowed in
>>this
>>>>>>>meeting. Executive board is present. Composite is
>>>>25%
>>>>>>>of the score.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So both contestants make the top 15. It is
>>possible
>>>>>>>for judges to score girl with weak talent higher
>>in
>>>>>>>composite because they felt she was strong in 3
>of
>>>>>the
>>>>>>>4 categories. As it is to score a talent prelim
>>>>>winner
>>>>>>>lower because of being seen as average in 3 of
>the
>>>4
>>>>>>>categories. (If MAO wanted a reality TV show,
>>>>>>>recording and airing this meeting would get them
>>>>huge
>>>>>>>ratings)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Girl 1 composite 9+9+8=26×2.5=65 girl 2
>composite
>>>>>>>7+7+6=20×2.5=50 though girl one scored less than
>>>>>girl
>>>>>>>2 in prelim she is now 15 points ahead of girl 2
>>>>>based
>>>>>>>on assigned composite score before final
>>>competition
>>>>>>>even starts. This is why so many say the
>>>competition
>>>>>>>is won in interview. The judge falls in love and
>>he
>>>>>>>gives you a pass on your poor talent. Basically
>>you
>>>>>>>need enough points to make the cut to 15. Then
>you
>>>>>>>might move ahead just as above in composite
>>scoring
>>>>>>>because you were so impressive in interview and
>>>your
>>>>>>>speaking ability on stage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now on to final competition. Please note once a
>>>>>>>contestant is in top 15, judges are asked to not
>>>>>score
>>>>>>>below a 6 during final competition. Girl 2 will
>>>need
>>>>>>>to make up points to move ahead of girl 1 or
>>anyone
>>>>>>>else scoring higher in composite. This is not
>>>likely
>>>>>>>because she would need to score 9s while girl 1
>>>>would
>>>>>>>need to score 7s. Remember they already like girl
>>1
>>>>>in
>>>>>>>her speaking abilities. This is why some say the
>>>>>>>judges meeting determines the top 10 and top 5.
>>>>>>>Placement among the 15 is hard to change post one
>>>>>>>category of competition. Meaning if you are
>placed
>>>>>>>12th it is not likely you will bump out 11 and 10
>>>>>>>after one category and move into the top 10.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Girl 1 composite 65 talent 6+6+6=18×3.0=54 OSI
>>>>>>>10+10+10=30×2.5=75 EG 10+9+9=28×2.0=56 Total
>>>>final
>>>>>>>score 250
>>>>>>>Girl 2 composite 50 talent 9+9+9=27×3.0=81 OSI
>>>>>>>7+7+7=21×2.5=52.5 EG 7+7+7=21×2.0=42 Total
>>final
>>>>>>>score 225.5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Girl 1 makes top 5 girl 2 does not. Note girl 2
>>>fell
>>>>>>>behind even more as talent percentage decreased
>to
>>>>>>>30%. Top five scores are wiped clean and girls
>>are
>>>>>>>given a final question that is not scored but
>>>viewed
>>>>>>>to help with the ranking of the final ballot.
>>>Judges
>>>>>>>are to rank from 1 being highest giving 10 points
>>>to
>>>>>5
>>>>>>>being lowest giving 0 points as to whom they feel
>>>is
>>>>>>>the best over all candidate for the job of Miss
>>SC.
>>>>>>>Where this gets crazy is when the 1s are split
>>>among
>>>>>>>the judges. Basically anyone in the top five can
>>>>come
>>>>>>>up on top. Judges are charged with staying
>>>>consistent
>>>>>>>with ranking based on their scoring but judges
>are
>>>>>>>human and can have a change of heart when it
>comes
>>>>to
>>>>>>>ranking. There are too many scenarios to post
>here
>>>>>and
>>>>>>>this post is long enough. I will leave you to
>play
>>>>>>>with numbers for final ballot and this final
>>>>>thought.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It is not all about the scoring numbers in SC and
>>>>>most
>>>>>>>of you know that. Fund raising efforts are seen
>by
>>>>>>>judges during competition top 5 and awards are
>>>given
>>>>>>>out on stage. This may or may not have an effect
>>on
>>>>a
>>>>>>>judge consciously or subconsciously. Emphasis has
>>>>for
>>>>>>>a number years has been on being the Miracle
>>Maker.
>>>>>>>Whether anyone likes it or not fund raising plays
>>a
>>>>>>>role in this competition. Tell me one Miss winner
>>>in
>>>>>>>the last 7 years that did not either sell the
>most
>>>>ad
>>>>>>>pages, bring in a diamond sponsor or make top 5
>>for
>>>>>>>miracle maker.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
|