VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:48:50 10/19/11 Wed
Author: George
Subject: Re: Infant baptism? Yes? No?
In reply to: john 's message, "Re: Infant baptism? Yes? No?" on 13:51:15 10/16/11 Sun

>and you have shown yourself, in your bitterness lois,
>that we can trust little of what you have to say...
>if really we can trust anything you have to say...
>
>john
>
>

John, the First Presidency said that it had no intention of taking the church into the NCC/WCC, and that Price was the liar for saying so. Then, lo and behold, the church announces that it has joined the NCC.

The NCC is an ecumenical organization designed to water down Christian doctrine until it is nothing but water, and there can no longer be any disagreement about its contents. Since some denominations, such as the Methodist church (to one of whose seminaries all CofC leadership candidates are sent to learn theology) practicies infant baptism, although it does not require it. It is much easier to see the direct connexion between NCC membership and infant baptism than it is to see the connexion between church approval of sodomy and future church approval of pedophilia and/or bestiality.

After all this ecumenism, I doubt that the CofC leadership has any idea what it or the church is supposed to believe at this point, so it will simply settle for whatever is convenient and will placate the tithers this week.

What difference does any unfounded allegations and insinuations you have to make about Lois' mental state have to do with the facts here?

You and other liberals constantly take issue with Glenn's proposition that all liberals are criminally insane, but CofC agents have absolutely no problem using the ad hominem argument that any of your critics are just unhinged and should be ignored.

George

"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain."
L. Frank Baum

"Pay no attention to homosexual priests -- it's just a rumor."
Any CofC liberal

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.