No insult intended. -- A Willoughby Station Dicussion Forum With Standards

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

08/ 7/25 02:18:23

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

Subject: No insult intended.

Author:
Concerned Parent

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tue, Sep 01 2009, 9:18:49
In reply to: John 's message, "Has had enough" on Tue, Sep 01 2009, 8:32:57

I am not trying to insult anyone's intelligence. My statement was "there is no way of telling if the removal of the goals was the sole reason for improvement.". Notice the word "sole" in that statement. If you can prove this statement incorrect please do, and I will accept that I was wrong. Keep in mind that they were removed after school started, after the weather started to turn cooler, and after an arrest in the area. All could be contributing factors.

I suppose, using your logic, since after the backboards were replaced that first time and there were no incidents for the next several months, that it proves the basketball courts are not the issue. See how easy it is to take an opinion, and present it as fact?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Same time year before	John	Tue, Sep 01 2009, 11:07:10
The Patriot? -- Ben, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 12:54:08 Are you kidding ? -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 13:28:10 The Arrogant Wall Responds -- Ben, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 14:05:08 Look who's talking -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 14:18:59 Patrol concern.. -- Brian Snyder, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 14:51:10 Good Points -- Lori, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 15:01:32 Rock and a hard place -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 15:58:08 How? -- Tom H., Tue, Sep 01 2009, 14:30:34 I applaud you. -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 14:59:43 Hearsay -- Concerned Parent, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 18:40:48 $$$ and fact finding -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 20:43:15 yes, a major ding -- Concerned Parent, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 21:15:08 $$$, a different perspective -- Concerned Parent, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 21:41:43 Numbers are not right. -- John, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 6:49:37 How? -- Concerned Parent, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 7:58:14 Percentages -- Lori, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 8:27:54 Security expense -- Brian Snyder, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 9:43:36 Conservative Board -- not yet, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 14:21:32 Forgot this one too -- Still not yet, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 14:24:50 Are we all alone in this? -- Butch Huber, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 16:26:30 Agreed -- John, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 17:55:08 Cameras -- Concerned Parent, Thu, Sep 03 2009, 9:28:35 Cameras -- Brian Snyder, Thu, Sep 03 2009, 10:10:22