Who are you to judge? -- A Willoughby Station Dicussion Forum With Standards

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

06/ 6/25 00:54:34

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

Subject: Who are you to judge?

Author:
Concerned Parent

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tue, Sep 01 2009, 7:46:07
In reply to: Lori 's message, "In name" on Tue, Sep 01 2009, 4:56:39

I think telling other people what to do and presenting opinion as fact is disrespectful. As for badgering, the only thing I've come close to badgering others on is trying to get you to prove your statement. And no, I never asked for names. When it comes to badgering, I'd say your better at it then me, constantly badgering me (and others) to post on the official site.

It is typical on these forums that when a person doesn't have a strong position, instead of attacking another persons points or statements, they attack the person. It's people like you that act in that manner that cause me to want to remain anonymous. If I have stated something incorrect or an opinion that you don't agree with, give a counter.

For the record, I don't know any Lori's, so you are just as anonymous to me as I am to you.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Has had enough	John	Tue, Sep 01 2009, 8:32:57
No insult intended. -- Concerned Parent, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 9:18:49 Same time year before -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 11:07:10 The Patriot? -- Ben, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 12:54:08 Are you kidding ? -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 13:28:10 The Arrogant Wall Responds -- Ben, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 14:05:08 Look who's talking -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 14:18:59 Patrol concern.. -- Brian Snyder, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 14:51:10 Good Points -- Lori, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 15:01:32 Rock and a hard place -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 15:58:08 How? -- Tom H., Tue, Sep 01 2009, 14:30:34 I applaud you. -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 14:59:43 Hearsay -- Concerned Parent, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 18:40:48 $$$ and fact finding -- John, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 20:43:15 yes, a major ding -- Concerned Parent, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 21:15:08 $$$, a different perspective -- Concerned Parent, Tue, Sep 01 2009, 21:41:43 Numbers are not right. -- John, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 6:49:37 How? -- Concerned Parent, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 7:58:14 Percentages -- Lori, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 8:27:54 Security expense -- Brian Snyder, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 9:43:36 Conservative Board -- not yet, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 14:21:32 Forgot this one too -- Still not yet, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 14:24:50 Are we all alone in this? -- Butch Huber, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 16:26:30 Agreed -- John, Wed, Sep 02 2009, 17:55:08 Cameras -- Concerned Parent, Thu, Sep 03 2009, 9:28:35 Cameras -- Brian Snyder, Thu, Sep 03 2009, 10:10:22