>
VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1]2345678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:46:45 04/07/04 Wed
Author: mvd
Subject: Murder; war and capital punishment
In reply to: Omega 's message, "Re: Stu - links on depleted uranium" on 05:17:23 04/07/04 Wed

This reminds me of the 8th grade. My teacher was explaining the sin of murder, then went on to outline the exceptions; killing in war and killing as a punishment. From that day forward, I was intrigued by the notion that mankind could make a universal statement, then qualify it with excpetions.

It is a well known fact that soldiers in battle are less likely to be psychologically disturbed by their killing if they believe that they are acting justly and rightly, that is, if they believe that the deaths serve a higher purpose.

Naturally, it is up to the mother culture to provide these soldiers with the proper moral foundation that will allow them to kill without remorse.

What I find most fascinating is that we are able to give two identical actions two completely opposite meanings. If we kill a man in war, this is somehow very different than killing a man in a bar fight, though the action, minus intent and moral foundation, is identical--- killing a man.

What is perhaps more interesting to discuss, however, is where do these societal conventions come from? They are obviously imagined and man-made. Therefore they must have some basis. Any thoughts?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.